From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forestire v. Little

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 2002
293 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-07560

Submitted March 28, 2002.

April 29, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Carmine's Bakery, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated August 1, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment against it upon its default in appearing, and denied its cross motion to vacate its default and compel the plaintiffs to accept its late answer.

McCarl Harris, Montgomery, N.Y. (James P. Harris of counsel), for appellant.

Monte J. Rosenstein, Middletown, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment upon the appellant's default, and denying the appellant's cross motion to compel them to accept its late answer, given its failure to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default in answering (see Hazen v. Bottiglieri, 286 A.D.2d 708; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382; Martyn v. Jones, 166 A.D.2d 508; Peters v. Pickard, 143 A.D.2d 81).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FRIEDMANN, H. MILLER and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Forestire v. Little

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 29, 2002
293 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Forestire v. Little

Case Details

Full title:LINDA FORESTIRE, et al., respondents, v. WALDO LITTLE, defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 29, 2002

Citations

293 A.D.2d 710 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 423

Citing Cases

Kaplinsky v. Mazor

Here, the affirmation of the defendants' attorney submitted in support of their motion to vacate indicated…

Harcztark v. Drive Variety, Inc.

Other delays which this Court excused were as long as one and one half years ( see Mena v. Choon-Ket Kong,…