From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foreman v. Skeif

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2014
115 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-20

Linda A. FOREMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Jihad SKEIF, Defendant–Respondent, Ira H. Foreman, Defendant.

Finger & Finger, a Professional Corporation, White Plains (Daniel S. Finger of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Gorelick, Friedman & Jacobson, LLP, New York (Dennis J. Monaco of counsel), for respondent.


Finger & Finger, a Professional Corporation, White Plains (Daniel S. Finger of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Gorelick, Friedman & Jacobson, LLP, New York (Dennis J. Monaco of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered April 4, 2013, which granted defendant Jihad Skeif's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Skeif presented unrefuted evidence that the vehicle operated by codefendant Ira H. Foreman made a left turn across the path of Skeif's oncoming vehicle in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141, and that he applied his brakes, but could not avoid the collision ( see Griffin v. Pennoyer, 49 A.D.3d 341, 341–342, 852 N.Y.S.2d 765 [1st Dept.2008] ). Skeif properly supported his motion with admissible evidence by submitting the parties' deposition transcripts ( see Franco v. Rolling Frito–Lay Sales, Ltd., 103 A.D.3d 543, 543, 962 N.Y.S.2d 54 [1st Dept.2013] ).

Plaintiff, a passenger in Foreman's vehicle, failed to raise a triable issue of fact. She failed to submit any evidence supporting her claim that Skeif could have avoided the accident by paying proper attention ( see Cadeau v. Gregorio, 104 A.D.3d 464, 465, 961 N.Y.S.2d 106 [1st Dept.2013] ). Moreover, there is no evidence in the record that Skeif was speeding or was otherwise negligently operating his vehicle ( see id.). ACOSTA, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Foreman v. Skeif

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2014
115 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Foreman v. Skeif

Case Details

Full title:Linda A. FOREMAN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Jihad SKEIF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 20, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1837
982 N.Y.S.2d 314

Citing Cases

Sarac-Marshall v. Mikalopas

Plaintiff was riding a bicycle southbound on Ralph Avenue when the vehicle driven by defendant John Mikalopas…

Revels v. Schoeps

Defendants submitted, inter alia, the testimony of defendant Mendoza that, with plaintiff as his passenger,…