From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 1, 2007
No. CIV-05-1487-C (W.D. Okla. May. 1, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV-05-1487-C.

May 1, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner proceeding pro se was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Roberts entered a Report and Recommendation on February 28, 2007, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and relevant law are set out in full in the accurate and well-reasoned opinion of the Magistrate Judge and no point would be served in repeating that analysis. In his objection, Petitioner merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted, and raises no issue which was not fully considered and correctly rejected by the Magistrate Judge, and no argument of fact or law is set forth in the objection which would require a different result.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ford v. Parker

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 1, 2007
No. CIV-05-1487-C (W.D. Okla. May. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Ford v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:FRANK FORD, Petitioner v. RANDY PARKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

No. CIV-05-1487-C (W.D. Okla. May. 1, 2007)