From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford Motor Company v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 24, 2000
821 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D02-750.

July 24, 2000.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Margarita Esquiroz, Judge.

Carlton Fields and Mark E. Grimes and Wendy F. Lumish and Nancy C. Ciampa and Benjamine Reid, Miami, for petitioner.

Deutsch Blumberg and Edward R. Blumberg and James C. Blecke, Miami, for respondent Lisa Smith.

Holland Knight and Peter Prieto, Miami, for respondents Motorola, Inc., and Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc.

James S. Usich, Miami, for respondent Fort Lauderdale Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

Simon Dondero, Miami, for respondent Julio C. Gonzalez.

Granoff Pena and Loren S. Granoff, Miami, for respondent J.P. Setina Manufacturing Company.

Before GODERICH, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.


We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the trial court order denying the motion of petitioner's attorney to appear pro hac vice. See Pepsico, Inc. v. Roque, 743 So.2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Keller Indus., Inc. v. Yoder, 625 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Certiorari granted; order quashed.


Summaries of

Ford Motor Company v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 24, 2000
821 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ford Motor Company v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. LISA SMITH, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 24, 2000

Citations

821 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Clare v. Coleman

Certiorari is the proper remedy for reviewing orders revoking an attorney's pro hac vice status. See Ford…