From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forbes v. Unit Texas Drilling, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-1434 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-1434

02-22-2012

JAY J FORBES, Plaintiff, v. UNIT TEXAS DRILLING, L.L.C. Defendant.


ORDER

Counsel for plaintiff has filed a Motion to Compel, (Docket Entry No. 16). The filing of this motion is inconsistent with this court's procedures, which require the following:

Any party wishing to make any discovery motion should arrange for a conference with the court before the preparation and submission of any motion papers. Call, fax, or e-mail Mrs. Eddins at Lisa_Eddins@txs.uscourts.gov at any time to arrange for a premotion conference and notify your adversary of the date and time fixed for the conference, subject to the availability of opposing counsel. The fax number is (713) 250-5213. To the extent that the proposed motion can be disposed of upon oral presentation at the conference, this will be done. If papers are necessary, the issues to be addressed and a schedule for the briefs will be defined in the conference.
This motion is stricken. A premotion conference is set for March 2, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. to address the subject matter of the motion.

SIGNED on February 22, 2012, at Houston, Texas.

_______________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Forbes v. Unit Texas Drilling, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Feb 22, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-1434 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Forbes v. Unit Texas Drilling, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:JAY J FORBES, Plaintiff, v. UNIT TEXAS DRILLING, L.L.C. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-1434 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2012)

Citing Cases

Spears v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr.

The record reflects that the Defendant's request for FMLA leave was granted and later extended beyond the…