From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontaine v. Juniper Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 2009
67 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1566.

November 24, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion by defendants Juniper, Durst and MT for summary judgment dismissing claims under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Carol R. Finocchio, New York, for appellants.

DeAngelis Hafiz, Mount Vernon (Talay Hafiz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, DeGrasse and Roman, JJ.


Plaintiff was injured when struck by several pieces of lumber that fell from a flatbed truck at ground level while he and coworkers were unloading the lumber by hand. The lumber, stacked at heights above plaintiffs head, had been piled inches from the edge of the flatbed. The court correctly granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), since the accident involved an elevation-related risk within the meaning of the statute, and his injuries were attributable, at least in part, to defendants' failure to provide proper protection as mandated by the statute ( see e.g. Cammon v City of New York, 21 AD3d 196, 200-201). The court also properly found that issues of fact precluded summary dismissal of the section 241 (6) claim to the extent it was based on a violation of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-2.1 (a) (2). The evidence raised issues of fact as to whether the lumber had been placed so close to the edge of the platform as to endanger plaintiff.


Summaries of

Fontaine v. Juniper Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 24, 2009
67 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Fontaine v. Juniper Assoc

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM E. FONTAINE, Respondent, v. JUNIPER ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8695
888 N.Y.S.2d 409

Citing Cases

Velez-Tejada v. 4525-4555 Apartments Corp.

Rather, "[a] plaintiff must show that the object fell ...because of the absence or inadequacy of a safety…

Urano v. United States Tennis Ass'n

coworker with personal knowledge of the facts and in reliance on his pretrial testimony, that: (1) USTA was…