From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Follett v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-3167 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-3167 (MJD/SRN).

December 2, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated November 16, 2010. Both sides have filed responses that agree with the Report and Recommendation.

Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks remand) and DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks reversal and an award of benefits);

2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 22] is DENIED; and

3. This action is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Dated: December 2, 2010


Summaries of

Follett v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-3167 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Follett v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Janelle Follett, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Dec 2, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-3167 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2010)