From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flynn v. McCraney

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 19, 2016
199 So. 3d 569 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–5802.

09-19-2016

Joseph Bryan FLYNN, Appellant, v. Amber McCRANEY and Christopher McCraney, Appellees.

Autumn O. Beck, Pensacola, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees.


Autumn O. Beck, Pensacola, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bryan Flynn appeals the trial court's final order adopting the general magistrate's Report and Recommendation dismissing Flynn's petition seeking to establish paternity, time-sharing, and other related relief. Because the minor child was born to the intact marriage of Amber and Christopher McCraney, we affirm the final order in all respects. See Slowinski v. Sweeney, 64 So.3d 128, 128–29 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding that a child born to an intact marriage cannot be the subject of a paternity proceeding brought by a biological father and determining it was fundamental error for the trial court to grant relief pursuant to a nonexistent cause of action); see also Sirdevan v. Strand, 120 So.3d 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), rev. denied, 147 So.3d 527 (Fla.2014) (table).

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flynn v. McCraney

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 19, 2016
199 So. 3d 569 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Flynn v. McCraney

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Bryan FLYNN, Appellant, v. Amber McCRANEY and Christopher McCraney…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 19, 2016

Citations

199 So. 3d 569 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)