From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fluker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 11, 1985
474 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. BE-44.

July 30, 1985. Rehearing Denied September 11, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, Charles E. Miner, Jr., J.

Bobby Lee Fluker, pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The defendant, Bobby Lee Fluker, filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 alleging that at his trial the state knowingly used perjured testimony and that he had ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied relief on the grounds that the basis for the motion could have been raised on direct appeal. The trial court erred because both bases can be proper grounds for post-conviction relief; however, the motion is facially insufficient for failure to contain a statement of the facts relied upon in support of the motion as required by Rule 3.850(f).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fluker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 11, 1985
474 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Fluker v. State

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY LEE FLUKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 11, 1985

Citations

474 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Dorch v. State

A number of decisions have denied rule 3.850 motions for failure to contain a sufficiently explicit statement…