From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 12, 2015
461 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101808

05-12-2015

Michael Floyd, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, for Movant/Appellant. Mary Highland Moore, Jefferson City, for Respondent/Respondent.


Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, for Movant/Appellant.

Mary Highland Moore, Jefferson City, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Floyd appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

--------


Summaries of

Floyd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 12, 2015
461 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Floyd v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Floyd, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

461 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Floyd v. Griffith

Petitioner thereafter filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule…