From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Henline

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv580-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv580-MHT (WO)

11-20-2017

ANTONIO FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HENLINE, Warden, ECJ, et al., Defendants.


OPINION

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, who at the time of filing was an inmate in the Elmore County Jail, filed this lawsuit alleging violations of several of his constitutional rights in connection with his criminal case and the treatment he received in the jail. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 20th day of November, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Floyd v. Henline

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 20, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv580-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Floyd v. Henline

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HENLINE, Warden, ECJ, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17cv580-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2017)