From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 23, 2018
No. 1D17-3298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D17-3298

02-23-2018

BRYAN FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Bryan Flowers, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED. See Hamilton v. State, 996 So. 2d 964, 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (rejecting defendant's claim that his sentence violates Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993), where, as here, the sentence "do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if all sentences subject to enhancement under the habitual felony offender statute had been enhanced (but run concurrently), and because his sentence[] also do[es] not, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum he could have received if none of his sentences had been enhanced but all had been ordered to run consecutively"). WETHERELL, ROWE, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Bryan Flowers, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Summaries of

Flowers v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 23, 2018
No. 1D17-3298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Flowers v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 23, 2018

Citations

No. 1D17-3298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 23, 2018)