From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Shanawar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19cv139 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19cv139

03-28-2021

RODNEY FLOWERS v. ALAM SHANAWAR, ET AL.


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Rodney Flowers, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit against Alam Shanawar, John Wang and Sharon Parker. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court.

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the motion be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 16) is GRANTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

So ORDERED and SIGNED, Mar 28, 2021.

/s/_________

Ron Clark

Senior Judge


Summaries of

Flowers v. Shanawar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 28, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19cv139 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Flowers v. Shanawar

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY FLOWERS v. ALAM SHANAWAR, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:19cv139 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2021)

Citing Cases

Beckendorf v. Fleischman

Defendants also argue that Plaintiff fails to state a valid claim because the allegations against Ham,…