In Bernard v. Torrence, 5 G. J. 383, this Court held that where the acceptance was required by return mail, no other mode of acceptance would be sufficient.
Summary of this case from Noel Co. v. Atlas Cement Co.No. 2100.
April 8, 1969.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Thomas R. Waddell, Jr., Judge.
Affirmed.
In Bernard v. Torrence, 5 G. J. 383, this Court held that where the acceptance was required by return mail, no other mode of acceptance would be sufficient.
Summary of this case from Noel Co. v. Atlas Cement Co.Full title:FLORIDA WATER AND UTILITIES COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. BERNARD…
Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Date published: Apr 8, 1969
In Wiswell v. Bresnahan, 84 Me. 397, it was held that where an acceptance is required to be in writing, no…