From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 2005
892 So. 2d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-2720.

February 9, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leonard E. Glick, Judge.

Omar Fletcher, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


We affirm the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Contrary to the appellant's argument, only one qualifying prior conviction was needed to sentence him as a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2000); Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that sequential conviction requirement of section 775.084(5) is inapplicable since only one predicate offense was necessary for the trial court to adjudicate defendant as a habitual violent felony offender). Hence, the appellant's prior conviction for aggravated battery properly served as the qualifying predicate for his sentencing as a habitual violent felony offender.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fletcher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 2005
892 So. 2d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Fletcher v. State

Case Details

Full title:Omar FLETCHER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 9, 2005

Citations

892 So. 2d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

McMurtry v. State

Contrary to the defendant's assertion, under section 775.081(b), Florida Statutes (1995), only one qualifying…