From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flessas v. Heyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1985
107 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 10, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (E. Danzig, J.).


In this action to recover for injuries suffered as a result of the alleged negligence of defendants, it was ascertained that the attorney assigned by defendants' attorney of record to review the case in its initial stages was the wife of the attorney assigned by the law firm representing plaintiffs to try the case for plaintiffs. A motion to disqualify plaintiffs' attorneys was made and denied. This appeal by defendants followed.

In the interim, the law firm then representing plaintiffs withdrew and a stipulation was entered into substituting other counsel for plaintiffs.

Since defendants have already been accorded all the relief which they could obtain by a determination on the merits, the appeal becomes academic. Accordingly, we dismiss it as moot.

Concur — Asch, J.P., Bloom, Fein and Alexander, JJ.


Summaries of

Flessas v. Heyman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1985
107 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Flessas v. Heyman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FLESSAS et al., Respondents, v. JOHN HEYMAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 10, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Kurland v. Agresti

Where, as here, a party obtains all of the relief that he or she seeks, the matter has been rendered…

In re Schweit

The court concludes that the petitioner's demand that he be reinstated to employment, and his request that…