From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flemming v. California Adult Authority

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1970
433 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 24569.

November 9, 1970.

Richard Flemming, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard J. Schwab, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant filed a complaint in district court charging appellee with a deprivation of civil rights under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed the complaint. We affirm.

While the dismissal occurred before the filing of responsive pleading by the appellee, the appellant had been given leave to amend his original complaint and had done so. See, Rule 15(a) F.R.Civ.P.

The California Adult Authority is not a person within the meaning of the Civil Rights Act. Olson v. California Adult Authority, 423 F.2d 1326 (9th Cir. 1970) and Allison v. California Adult Authority, 419 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1969). Consequently, the order of the lower court dismissing the complaint must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Flemming v. California Adult Authority

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1970
433 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

Flemming v. California Adult Authority

Case Details

Full title:Richard FLEMMING, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Department of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 9, 1970

Citations

433 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Robinson v. California Bd. of Prison Terms

The Ninth Circuit has, in fact, held that the California Adult Authority, a predecessor to defendant BPT, is…

Nehara v. State

seeAllison v. California Adult Authority , 419 F.2d 822, 823 (9th Cir. 1969) (holding that state prison was…