From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleitas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 29, 2003
835 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-9.

Opinion filed January 29, 2003.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 93-27727.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Carlos Gonzalez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, and Frank Ingrassia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Carlos Fleitas appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence complaining that the trial court improperly excluded his sister from the courtroom at his probation violation hearing. He argues that although he did not object at the time, a contemporaneous objection was not necessary because the hearing was a deferred sentencing proceeding which can be corrected pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We reject this novel and creative argument. See Leveritt v. State, 817 So.2d 891, 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) ("Objections are required to place the trial court on notice that error may have been committed to provide the court an opportunity to correct any error."), citingCastor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla. 1978). A probation violation hearing is subject to the same Florida Evidence Code as any other hearing with the exception that hearsay is admissible.See Gonzalez v. State, 814 So.2d 1210, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fleitas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 29, 2003
835 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Fleitas v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS FLEITAS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 29, 2003

Citations

835 So. 2d 376 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)