From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleischman v. Glaser

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jul 1, 1899
28 Misc. 555 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

July, 1899.

Bullowa Bullowa, for appellant.

Louis Levy, for respondents.


This was an action brought to recover property wrongfully detained. As the record fails to show wrongful possession by the defendant, demand and refusal were necessary to constitute wrongful detention. Goodwin v. Wertheimer, 99 N.Y. 149; Porges v. Cohen, 23 Misc. 703. The plaintiff testifies that he never demanded the return of the property, and the bookkeeper of plaintiffs' vendor, testifying to an inquiry which, if it had been made by or for the plaintiffs, might be called a quasi demand, admits that the plaintiffs never requested him to act either on their behalf or by their authority.

For this reason, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

FREEDMAN, P.J., and LEVENTRITT, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Fleischman v. Glaser

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jul 1, 1899
28 Misc. 555 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

Fleischman v. Glaser

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FLEISCHMAN et al., Respondents, v . MAX GLASER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jul 1, 1899

Citations

28 Misc. 555 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
59 N.Y.S. 686

Citing Cases

Kamienska v. County of Westchester

(In fact, defendants urge, as alleged in their answer, that the moneys taken from Marallo and the other…