From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flanning v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jul 15, 2015
Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK

07-15-2015

VERNON FLANNING, SR., Plaintiff, v. H. BAKER, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING TO MAGISTRATE

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 84. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by Plaintiff,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Defendant Baker's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 76, is DENIED. This matter is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Baker.

SO ORDERED on July 15, 2015.

/s/ _________

MARK E. WALKER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flanning v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jul 15, 2015
Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Flanning v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:VERNON FLANNING, SR., Plaintiff, v. H. BAKER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

Case No. 5:12cv337-MW/CJK (N.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Igo

See Thompson, 805 Fed.Appx. at 904 (explaining that the “greater than de minimis requirement does not…

McKay v. Tona

survive a motion to strike his request for compensatory damages. See Thompson, 805 Fed.Appx. at 904…