From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flanagan v. Northern Lumber Company

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 19, 1955
222 F.2d 539 (2d Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 293, Docket 23501.

Argued April 21, 1955.

Decided May 19, 1955.

Cross Steates, Francis C. Steates, Utica, N.Y., for appellant.

Carroll, Amyot Doling, Saratoga Springs, N.Y. (James F. Carroll, Saratoga Springs, N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.


In addition to setting up its defenses to plaintiff's claim, defendant included in its answer four counterclaims, three for money damages against plaintiff's assignors and one for a judgment declaring certain conveyances of real and personal property made by plaintiff's assignors to certain named defendants to be void and declaring any judgments obtained on the first three counterclaims "to be a lien upon said property." One of the defendants named in the fourth counterclaim is Ida Ohlson, a resident of the State of Illinois, to whom plaintiff's assignor had transferred certain real property located in the Northern District of New York. Northern Lumber Company sought an order authorizing service on Ida Ohlson by publication, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1655. The district judge made an order, 17 F.R.D. 432, denying the motion. From that order Northern Lumber Company appeals.

The order in question was not final. Absent any final order whatever, by no possible interpretation of Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. rule 54(b), 28 U.S.C.A., could an appeal be proper even if the judge had made a certificate of finality pursuant to that Rule.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Flanagan v. Northern Lumber Company

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 19, 1955
222 F.2d 539 (2d Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Flanagan v. Northern Lumber Company

Case Details

Full title:William J. FLANAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORTHERN LUMBER COMPANY, Inc.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 19, 1955

Citations

222 F.2d 539 (2d Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

Nowell v. Nowell

Id. at 2076-77. Elsewhere Professor Moore states that quasi in rem actions are not cognizable under section…

Hegarty v. Luff

' (Emphasis supplied).         In the case of Flanagan v. Northern Lumber Co., D.C., 17 F.R.D. 432, 28 U.S.C.…