From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzpatrick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 2, 1982
414 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AK-324.

June 2, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Major B. Harding, J.

Reginald Fitzpatrick, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of Fitzpatrick's motion for post-conviction relief.

There is no merit to Fitzpatrick's contention that it was error for him to be charged by information rather than indictment for the crimes of burglary and grand theft.

He next contends that the trial court erred in failing to determine a factual basis for his pleas of guilty. The failure to ascertain the factual basis for negotiated pleas of guilty is an insufficient basis for reversal absent an allegation of prejudice or manifest injustice by the defendant. State v. Kendrick, 336 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1976); Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1975).

There was no allegation of prejudice or manifest injustice in this case.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fitzpatrick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 2, 1982
414 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Fitzpatrick v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD FITZPATRICK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 2, 1982

Citations

414 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The failure of the court to make a complete inquiry, or to receive a complete proffer, will generally not…

Ruiz v. State

The state contends, and we agree, that there was no allegation of prejudice or manifest injustice in this…