From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzgerald v. Rivers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2005
17 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-04780.

April 4, 2005.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), dated April 5, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment.

Mainetti, Mainetti O'Connor, Kingston, N.Y. (Regina A. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Mastro, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. In response to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320), the defendants raised a triable issue of fact ( see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Triad Distribs. v. Conde, 56 AD2d 648, 649; see also Call v. Ellenville Natl. Bank, 5 AD3d 521, 525-526).


Summaries of

Fitzgerald v. Rivers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2005
17 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Fitzgerald v. Rivers

Case Details

Full title:GLENN R. FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. DORIS M. RIVERS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 836

Citing Cases

Tribeca Lending Corp. v. Huseinovic

New York General Business Law (Gen Bus) § 349 (a).Triad Distributors, Inc. v Conde, 56 AD 2d 648, 648-649 [2d…