From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzgerald v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 22, 2013
No. 3:10-cv-01222 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-01222

01-22-2013

JAMES J. FITZGERALD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Griffin


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff James J. Fitzgerald's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record ("Motion") (Doc. No. 12), filed with an attached brief (Doc. No. 12-1). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response (Doc. No. 19), to which Mr. Fitzgerald filed a Reply (Doc. No. 20). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Griffin issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending the Motion be granted. (Doc. No. 21.) The Report was entered on December 21, 2012, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id. at 36.) Neither party has filed an objection to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Mr. Fitzgerald's Motion, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner, and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Fitzgerald v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 22, 2013
No. 3:10-cv-01222 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Fitzgerald v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. FITZGERALD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 22, 2013

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-01222 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Cover v. Berryhill

[Tr. 444, 649]. Due to the lack of an ongoing treating relationship, the Court finds Dr. Curfan is not a…