From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fite v. Port City State Bank

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, First District
May 10, 1979
582 S.W.2d 210 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 17422.

May 10, 1979.

Appeal from the District Court, Harris County, Peter S. Solito, J.

Parrish Parrish, Angelo Parrish, Houston, for appellants.

Sewell, Junell Riggs, David Speed Elder, Houston, for appellee.


Appellee, Port City State Bank, moves to dismiss this interlocutory appeal of the denial of appellant's application for a temporary injunction as moot. The injunction was sought to restrain appellee bank from disposing of appellant's automobile in a non-judicial foreclosure sale.

Appellee by virtue of a security agreement had a security interest in appellant's vehicle. Appellee previously sought a writ of sequestration alleging appellant was in default on the payment. The writ was denied as appellee misdescribed the automobile in question. Approximately eighteen months later appellee caused the automobile to be repossessed and appellant sought a temporary injunction to restrain any non-judicial sale. No other relief was sought by appellant. The injunction was denied and is the subject of this appeal. Appellant did not seek an injunction from this court pending the appeal. Appellee not being under any court order restraining a sale, has in fact foreclosed on the lien and the automobile has been sold. Appellee now moves to dismiss this cause as moot.

Texas courts have consistently held that an appeal of the denial of a temporary injunction to restrain the sale of property becomes moot where the property is sold bona fide before there is an adjudication of the appeal. Service Finance Corporation v. Grote, 133 Tex. 606, 131 S.W.2d 93 (Tex.Comm'n App. 1939, opinion adopted); State v. Jackson, 101 S.W.2d 346 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1937, no writ); Prince v. North State Bank, 425 S.W.2d 476 (Tex.Civ.App. Amarillo 1968, no writ); South Padre Development Co., Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank National Association, 538 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.Civ.App. Corpus Christi 1976, no writ). "A cause becomes moot when the appellate court's judgment cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then existing controversy . . ." 538 S.W.2d at 479. The subject matter of this appeal has ceased to exist. No order of this court could be made which would grant any effective relief regarding the order appealed from. Appellee's motion is granted and this cause is dismissed.


Summaries of

Fite v. Port City State Bank

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, First District
May 10, 1979
582 S.W.2d 210 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)
Case details for

Fite v. Port City State Bank

Case Details

Full title:Oscar FITE et al., Appellants, v. PORT CITY STATE BANK, Appellee

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Houston, First District

Date published: May 10, 1979

Citations

582 S.W.2d 210 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Toma Integrity, Inc. v. Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corp.

Cook, 2018 WL 1660078, at *3 (citing In re Smith Cty., 521 S.W.3d 447, 454-55 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2017, orig.…

SCHULZE v. EMC MTG. CORP.

EMC filed a motion requesting that this Court dismiss Schulze's appeal because the sale of the property in…