From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fishman v. Greenthal Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 2011
82 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4395.

March 3, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered January 22, 2010, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Peter R. Bray, Parsippany, NJ, of the Bar of the State of New Jersey, admitted pro hac vice, for appellant.

Braverman Associates, P.C., New York (Scott S. Greenspun of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Román, JJ.


Plaintiff failed to raise an inference that the board of directors of defendant cooperative corporation acted in bad faith in rejecting the prospective purchaser of plaintiffs shares in the coop ( see Jones v Surrey Coop. Apts., 263 AD2d 33, 36). Indeed, his own evidence demonstrates that the board, which under the proprietary lease had the right to withhold its approval of a sale "for any reason or for no reason," rejected the proposed purchaser for financial reasons.

Plaintiff also failed to substantiate his request for additional discovery ( see 263 AD2d at 37-38).

[Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 30115(U).]


Summaries of

Fishman v. Greenthal Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 2011
82 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Fishman v. Greenthal Management Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG FISHMAN, Appellant, v. CHARLES H. GREENTHAL MANAGEMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1574
917 N.Y.S.2d 858

Citing Cases

Morton v. 303 W. 122ND St. H.D.F.C.

Notwithstanding this deferential standard, the business judgment rule is not an "insuperable barrier" (…

Eva Xia v. 65 W. 87Th St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.

Further, Defendants contend that this authority to reject applicants whose financial profiles do not meet a…