From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fishman v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1964
20 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

April 29, 1964


Appeal from an order of Special Term, Supreme Court, denying a motion for a change of venue from Ulster to Westchester County on the ground there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had in Ulster County. The affidavit of the attorney for the defendant, as the main basis for the motion, alleged that his client cannot obtain a fair trial in Ulster County because the attorney for the plaintiff is employed by one of the Justices of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial District. The mere belief or feeling, such as expressed here, is not sufficient grounds for the granting of the motion. ( Noonan v. Luther, 128 App. Div. 673. ) We perceive no reason for interfering with the exercise of the sound discretion of Special Term. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fishman v. Fishman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 29, 1964
20 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Fishman v. Fishman

Case Details

Full title:CECELIA B. FISHMAN, Respondent, v. BARNETT S. FISHMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1964

Citations

20 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Krupka v. County of Westchester

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs. Contrary to the contention of the appellant, we…

In re Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig.

The mere fact that plaintiff's decedent was a person of some prominence and was employed at the time of his…