From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 5, 1990
559 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-857.

April 5, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Osceola County, Belvin Perry, Jr., J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Johnny Fisher pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in cocaine and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The applicable guideline sentence range was 9 to 12 years. The judge sentenced defendant to two concurrent 12-year sentences with the proviso, "if you are released under the provisions provided for early release, that the balance of the 12-year sentence is to be served on probation." Fisher urges that the sentence is improper because such probation, when the term is both indefinite and uncertain, is not authorized by Section 948.01, Florida Statutes (1987). We agree and reverse. See Heuring v. State, 559 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1990).

Although the trial court could accomplish the same result by sentencing appellant to incarceration on one count and concurrent probation on the other count, the sentences as imposed are illegal and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DANIEL, C.J., and W. SHARP, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 5, 1990
559 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Fisher v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY FISHER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 5, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 362 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Maynard v. State

This type of sentence is illegal because the term of probation is not definite and certain. Heuring v. State,…