From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fischer v. Queen Hedwig's Polish Catholic Church

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 7, 1945
327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,405. (Abstract of Decisions.)

Opinion filed November 7, 1945 Released for publication November 27, 1945

MECHANICS' LIENS, § 182proof of allegations as entitling plaintiff to enforce mechanic's lien. In action to enforce mechanic's lien, where it appeared that plaintiff was employed by defendant church to render services as architect and superintendent of construction, and plaintiff contended fee was to be one and one half per cent of lowest bid received on specifications, whereas defendant contended that agreement was for smaller stated amount, held that plaintiff was entitled to enforce lien, since evidence showed that agreement for plaintiff's services was made in accordance with allegations of complaint and defendant's contentions were not borne out by evidence.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. ROBERT J. DUNNE, Judge, presiding.

Reversed and remanded with directions. Heard in the third division, first district, this court at the June term, 1945.

Peden, Ryan Andreas, for appellant;

Gerald Ryan, of counsel;

No appearance for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 7, 1945; released for publication November 27, 1945.


Summaries of

Fischer v. Queen Hedwig's Polish Catholic Church

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
Nov 7, 1945
327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
Case details for

Fischer v. Queen Hedwig's Polish Catholic Church

Case Details

Full title:F.W. Fischer, Appellant, v. Queen Hedwig's Polish National Catholic Church…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: Nov 7, 1945

Citations

327 Ill. App. 215 (Ill. App. Ct. 1945)
63 N.E.2d 675

Citing Cases

Barton v. Montrose Ave. Hospital

We think our function is to determine whether under the circumstances in this case the chancellor's decision…