From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Firststone Heights LLC v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Oct 28, 2020
NO. 03-19-00108-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2020)

Summary

reversing and rendering judgment dismissing action without prejudice

Summary of this case from Santis v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.

Opinion

NO. 03-19-00108-CV

10-28-2020

Firststone Heights LLC (1512 Forest Trail Apts), Appellant v. Travis Central Appraisal District, Appellee


FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. D-1-GN-17-004782 , THE HONORABLE SCOTT JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Travis County in a suit contesting the order of the Appraisal Review Board setting the value of a lot in Austin. Appellant is Firststone Heights LLC and appellee is the Travis County Central Appraisal District (District). We will reverse the judgment.

The petition, answer, judgment, motion for new trial, motion for attorney's fees and sanctions, and order denying motion for new trial and motion for attorney's fees and sanctions refer to appellant as "Firststone." But appellant's notice of appeal and brief in this Court style appellant as "Firestone." We will follow the usage in the trial court.

Firststone set the case for trial but failed to appear when the case was called. The District, however, was present and announced ready. In the absence of Firststone, the trial court proceeded to try the case and rendered judgment fixing the appraised value of the property. The judgment recited in part, "After considering the pleadings, evidence, and [the District's] arguments, and because [Firststone] failed to appear and present evidence or argument, the Court rules in favor of [the District]."

Firststone argues that the proper remedy was dismissal of the case. We agree. When a plaintiff fails to appear and prosecute his case, the trial court cannot try the plaintiff's cause of action, and the only remedy is to dismiss the same. Smock v. Fischel, 207 S.W.2d 891, 902 (Tex. 1948); Federal Royalties Co. v. McKnight, 77 S.W.2d 542, 543 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1934, writ ref'd); State v. Herrera, 25 S.W.3d 326, 328 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, no pet.); see Chacon v. Jellison, No. 03-02-00072-CV, 2003 WL 1560184, at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 27, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that when plaintiff fails to appear for trial, trial court may only dismiss plaintiff's claims without prejudice).

We reverse the trial court's judgment and render judgment dismissing Firstone's action without prejudice.

/s/_________

Bob E. Shannon, Justice Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Shannon* Reversed and Rendered Filed: October 28, 2020 * Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex. Gov't Code § 74.003(b).


Summaries of

Firststone Heights LLC v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Oct 28, 2020
NO. 03-19-00108-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2020)

reversing and rendering judgment dismissing action without prejudice

Summary of this case from Santis v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.
Case details for

Firststone Heights LLC v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Firststone Heights LLC (1512 Forest Trail Apts), Appellant v. Travis…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Oct 28, 2020

Citations

NO. 03-19-00108-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

Santis v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist.

For these reasons, we sustain appellants' first and second issues and conclude that the district court's…