From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

First Finance Co. v. Ross

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fourth Division
Oct 7, 1966
221 N.E.2d 40 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)

Opinion

Gen. No. 50,710.

October 7, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. GEORGE B. WEISS, Judge, presiding. Defendants' appeal dismissed.

Carl J. Greenberg, of Chicago, for appellants.

Masor, Baime Gainer, of Chicago, for appellee.


Defendants appeal from the denial of their petition for a new trial under section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill Rev Stats, 1963, c 110, § 72).

After a bench trial the defendants were found to have converted plaintiff's property and judgment was entered in the amount of $12,000 plus costs. In addition, the court made a special finding that malice was the gist of the action against one of the defendants, Hugh Ross. In their petition defendants allege that the testimony of plaintiff's sole witness was perjured.

The issues presented in this appeal are moot since the aforesaid judgment was reversed by this court [First Finance Co. v. Ross, 75 Ill. App.2d 403]. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ENGLISH and McCORMICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

First Finance Co. v. Ross

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fourth Division
Oct 7, 1966
221 N.E.2d 40 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
Case details for

First Finance Co. v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:First Finance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh Ross and Margaret M…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fourth Division

Date published: Oct 7, 1966

Citations

221 N.E.2d 40 (Ill. App. Ct. 1966)
221 N.E.2d 40

Citing Cases

First Finance Co. v. Ross

This is an appeal from the denial of defendants' post-trial motion either (1) that judgment in favor of the…