From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finkelstein v. Brodsky

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Submitted October 28, 1932 —

Decided January 5, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz Friedenberg.

For the appellant, Stuhr Vogt.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 55.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Finkelstein v. Brodsky

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 5, 1933
163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Finkelstein v. Brodsky

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HYMAN BRODSKY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1933

Citations

163 A. 664 (N.J. 1933)
163 A. 664

Citing Cases

McEnaney v. Spedick

The fact that a writing, which embodies the essential elements of a contract, acknowledges the receipt of…