From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Findlay v. Economy Premier Assurance Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Feb 9, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-00434-BLW (D. Idaho Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-00434-BLW

02-09-2012

JAMES FINDLAY, Plaintiff, v. ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Rhode Island corporation; DOES I-V, unknown parties, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

ORDER

Before the Court is a motion to stay and compel arbitration filed by Plaintiff James Findlay. (Dkt. 14). Findlay moves to stay the litigation and compel arbitration because he "desires to protect his contractual and statutory rights under Idaho law." Pl.'s Br. at 1, Dkt. 14. Defendant Economy Premier Assurance opposes the motion, arguing that the insurance contract requires that both parties consent before the matter can be arbitrated, and Economy Premier does not consent.

Economy Premier refers the Court to the arbitration provision contained in the insurance contract, which provides: "Upon written consent of both parties, any disagreement will be settled by arbitration." Auto Insurance Policy at 12, Ex. A to Schroeder Aff., 15-1. Given this clear and unambiguous language requiring both parties' consent and Economy Premier's representation that it does not consent, the Court must deny Findlay's motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Demand for Arbitration (Dkt. 14) is DENIED.

_________________________

B. Lynn Winmill

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Findlay v. Economy Premier Assurance Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Feb 9, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-00434-BLW (D. Idaho Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Findlay v. Economy Premier Assurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FINDLAY, Plaintiff, v. ECONOMY PREMIER ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Rhode…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-00434-BLW (D. Idaho Feb. 9, 2012)