From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Finch v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 20, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff Lauristine Finch allegedly sustained serious physical injury when she fell from her bicycle on a street of the Incorporated Village of Freeport on July 12, 1988. The plaintiffs asserted that the accident was caused by the existence of a defect in the roadway at the subject location. The defendant's claims examiner averred that the Village had not received prior written notice of any defective, dangerous or hazardous condition existing at the accident site. Photographs, submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, indicate that some patchwork was undertaken at the scene of the injured plaintiff's fall at some time prior to the accident.

Significantly, crucial discovery, such as an examination before trial of the defendant's employees, has not been conducted in the instant case. The defendant's motion was clearly premature inasmuch as the plaintiffs have not had the opportunity to conduct disclosure with respect to the defendant's record-keeping practices, which is a matter firmly within the exclusive knowledge of the moving party (see, Krupp v Aetna Life Cas. Co., 103 A.D.2d 252, 262).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion, without prejudice to renewal upon completion of disclosure. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Finch v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Finch v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

Case Details

Full title:LAURISTINE FINCH et al., Respondents, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF FREEPORT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 174

Citing Cases

Arkin v. Vill. of Owego

Even the proposed amended complaint fails to allege prior written notice, or an act of affirmative act of…