From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Filmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 23, 2006
935 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D06-2854.

August 23, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ana I. Gardiner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-2188 CF10A.

Carson Filmore, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order which denied appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion and granted the state's motion to enjoin appellant from further pro se filings. We find that the trial court afforded appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard before imposing sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999). The state filed its Motion for Injunction on May 5, 2006. Appellant had an opportunity to respond to the motion, which put him on notice of the potential sanction, and failed to do so. The trial court entered its order granting the state's motion on June 5, 2006, a full month after the motion had been filed.

Appellant's motion raised an issue that had been affirmed on direct appeal and rejected in two prior rule 3.800(a) motions which were also affirmed by this court. Filmore v. State, 730 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Filmore v. State, 854 So.2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Filmore v. State, 926 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Appellant's frivolous and repetitive filings are an abuse of procedure, and the trial court properly imposed sanctions.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Filmore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 23, 2006
935 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Filmore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carson FILMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 23, 2006

Citations

935 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

MAE v. STATE

Affirmed. See Graham v. Graham, 898 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 2d…

Epps v. State

Rucker v. City of Ocala, 684 So.2d 836, 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (citation omitted). We recognize that in…