From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figueroa v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2019
Case No.: 3:12-cr-00236-GPC (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:12-cr-00236-GPC Case No.: 3:16-cv-01435-GPC

07-31-2019

JEREMIAH FIGUEROA (32), Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER LIFTING STAY AND DIRECTING GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND

On June 9, 2016, Petitioner Jeremiah Figueroa ("Petitioner"), proceeding with counsel, filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255 arguing that his increased sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutional under Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). (Dkt. No. 1972.) On August 9, 2017, the Court denied in part and stayed in part Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pending the United States Supreme Court's ruling on Sessions v. Lynch, No. 15-1498, cert. granted sub nom. Lynch v. Dimaya, 137 S. Ct. 31 (Sept. 29, 2016) and the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. Begay, No. 14-10080, where it was considering the constitutionality of 15 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B). (Dkt. No. 2084.) On March 29, 2017, a ruling on the Begay case was deferred pending ruling by the Supreme Court in Dimaya v. Lynch. (United States v. Begay, Ninth Circuit Case No. 14-10080, Dkt. No. 87, Mar. 29, 2017.) On January 10, 2019, the Ninth Circuit continued its deferral on a ruling in the Begay case pending resolution of the Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Davis. (Id., Dkt. No. 107, Jan. 10, 2019.)

On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court held that the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is unconstitutionally vague. United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2336 (2019). On July 14, 2019, Petitioner filed a Notice of Supreme Court Decision in Davis Declaring 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) Unconstitutional arguing that the government's "case-specific" approach was rejected by the Supreme Court and the Solicitor General conceded that Davis will apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. Petitioner also seeks a ruling as soon as possible. Accordingly, the Court LIFTS the stay and DIRECTS the government to respond to Petitioner's Notice on or before August 9 , 2019 .

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2019

/s/_________

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Figueroa v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2019
Case No.: 3:12-cr-00236-GPC (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Figueroa v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JEREMIAH FIGUEROA (32), Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

Case No.: 3:12-cr-00236-GPC (S.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2019)