From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Figaro v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 6, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion to set aside the verdict is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate judgment on the verdict.

On September 24, 1989, the infant plaintiff, Zanifa Figaro, was injured as she was crossing Troy Avenue in Brooklyn, when she was struck by a car driven by the defendant Yvette Welsh and owned by the defendant Lydia Price. A jury trial was held to determine solely the issue of liability. After the jury found that the defendants were not negligent, the Supreme Court set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and granted a new trial.

Because the jury could have reached its verdict that the defendants were not negligent on a fair interpretation of the evidence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the defendants as contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Figaro v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1993
195 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Figaro v. Price

Case Details

Full title:ZANIFA FIGARO, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, ROBECCA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
601 N.Y.S.2d 812

Citing Cases

Fontana v. Kurian

Defendant appeals. Because it cannot be said that the jury verdict is inconsistent with any fair…