From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. James B. Sipe & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 1935
181 A. 377 (Pa. 1935)

Opinion

October 16, 1935.

November 25, 1935.

Gianni v. Russell, 281 Pa. 320, followed.

Argued October 16, 1935.

Before FRAZER, C. J., KEPHART, SCHAFFER, MAXEY, DREW, LINN and BARNES, JJ.

Appeal, No. 250, March T., 1935, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1933, No. 890, in case of Arthur W. Fields v. James B. Sipe Company. Judgment affirmed.

Karl E. Weise, with him Allen G. Lynch and Harold R. Stadtfeld, for appellant.

O. K. Price, with him Robert A. Applegate and Rose Eichenauer, for appellee.


This appeal is ruled by Gianni v. Russell, 281 Pa. 320, in which the questions involved were practically identical with those now before us. The decision in that case was adverse to appellant's contention here.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.


Summaries of

Fields v. James B. Sipe & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 25, 1935
181 A. 377 (Pa. 1935)
Case details for

Fields v. James B. Sipe & Co.

Case Details

Full title:Fields, Appellant, v. James B. Sipe Company

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 25, 1935

Citations

181 A. 377 (Pa. 1935)
181 A. 377

Citing Cases

Miners Savings Bank v. Tracy

Appellant availed herself of the jury trial allowed by section 5 of the Act of 1905 which furnishes an…

Marks v. Philadelphia Wholesale Drug Company

Clearly extrinsic evidence would be admissible to cure these defects and supply the deficiencies. See Fields…