From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fields v. Fire & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 28, 1960
114 S.E.2d 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

38265.

DECIDED APRIL 28, 1960.

Action for fraud. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Camp. February 5, 1960.

Sidney I. Rose, for plaintiffs in error.

Hurt, Gaines, Baird, Peek Peabody, J. Corbett Peek, Jr., contra.


Where a plaintiff seeks to recover from a defendant because of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations, and there is no fiduciary relationship between the parties, if the only alleged misrepresentation is as to law or as to a matter of law no actionable fraud is set forth.

DECIDED APRIL 28, 1960.


Jerry H. Fields and Jerry Blonder, doing business as J J Realty Company sued Fire Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut to recover $20,000 because of alleged false and fraudulent representations made by the defendant through its agent Jacob Goldstein. The trial court sustained the defendant's general demurrer to the petition and the plaintiffs now except.


A companion case to the case sub judice was previously before this court. In that case the plaintiffs sued the defendant on the policy of insurance and the judgment of this court affirming the judgment of the trial court finding for the plaintiffs was reversed by the Supreme Court. See Fire Casualty Ins. Co. of Conn. v. Fields, 94 Ga. App. 272 ( 94 S.E.2d 113), 212 Ga. 814 ( 96 S.E.2d 502), and 95 Ga. App. 225 ( 97 S.E.2d 556). In the present case the plaintiffs seek to recover, not on the policy, but because of the defendant's agent's misrepresentations to them that they had coverage under the policy when in fact no such coverage existed.

Under the decision of this court in Sherwin-Williams Co. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co., 97 Ga. App. 298, 299 ( 102 S.E.2d 919), the petition was fatally defective, and to paraphrase the language of Judge Quillian, now Justice Quillian, in that case: When the defendant's agent allegedly advised the plaintiff, with whom no fiduciary relationship existed, that they were protected from loss under the provisions of the fire insurance policy, he was expressing an opinion of law and this would not constitute actionable fraud. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Parker, 67 Ga. App. 1, 8 ( 19 S.E.2d 409); Hart v. Waldo, 117 Ga. 590 ( 43 S.E. 998); Claxton Bank v. Smith, 34 Ga. App. 265 ( 129 S.E. 142); Bernstein v. Peters, 69 Ga. App. 525, 534 ( 26 S.E.2d 192); Christopher v. Whitmire, 199 Ga. 280, 283 ( 34 S.E.2d 100); Howard v. Georgia Home Ins. Co., 102 Ga. 137 ( 29 S.E. 143); Bankers Health Life Ins. Co. v. Givens, 43 Ga. App. 43, 50 ( 157 S.E. 906). Accordingly, the judgment sustaining the general demurrer must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fields v. Fire & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 28, 1960
114 S.E.2d 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Fields v. Fire & Casualty Insurance

Case Details

Full title:FIELDS et al. v. FIRE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 28, 1960

Citations

114 S.E.2d 540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960)
114 S.E.2d 540

Citing Cases

Parris Son v. Campbell

3. The representations alleged to have been made by the agent of the insurer, whether prior to or after the…

Clinton v. State Farm c. Ins. Co.

As such, it was a representation or expression of opinion as to a matter of law, which is not actionable…