From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Field Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Mar 13, 1961
360 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1961)

Opinion

No. 19,241.

Decided March 13, 1961.

From a judgment for plaintiff in garnishment proceedings, the garnishee brings error,

Affirmed.

1. GARNISHMENT — Assumption of Debts — Choses in Action — Liability — Release. Where for a valuable consideration one has assumed the obligation of another to plaintiff he may be liable as garnishee, it not being necessary that such garnishee hold tangible or real property or personal property of the debtor; the assumption of the debts of another when in proper form is a right, credit or chose in action required to be reported in garnishment proceedings under Rule 103 (a), R.C.P. Colo.

2. Agreement to Assume Debts — Consideration. Where garnishee undertook to complete certain construction in behalf of debtor, and to receive all funds and deposits from sales and closings and to assume obligations of debtor, agreement was based on adequate consideration and rendered garnishee liable on obligation of debtor to plaintiff.

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry E. Santo, Judge.

Mr. ROBERT L. McDOUGAL, MR. JOSEPH G. STUDHOLME, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. DONALDSON, HOFFMAN GOLDSTEIN, Mr. ALAN A. ARMOUR, for defendant in error.


THE parties appear herein reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and will be referred to as they their appeared.

Plaintiff obtained a money judgment for $3,375.00 against the Florado Construction Company on August 12, 1959. The judgment was on a contract for the sale of houses belonging to Florado, which were completed by Field Family Construction Co., garnishee below, which received the proceeds from the sales. Motion for new trial was heard and denied and a write of execution on the Florado's judgment was thereafter issued and returned unsatisfied. A writ of garnishment was served on the garnishee on August 28, 1959, which answered denying that it was indebted to the Florado Company Plaintiff traversed the answer and trial was had to the court. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and garnishee prosecutes this writ of error.

The basis of plaintiff's case is the agreement of garnishee Field Family Construction Co. to assume the debts of Florado Company. This agreement, which appeared by resolution in the company minutes, was adjudged by the trial court to be the basis of the garnishee's liability to plaintiff.

We are satisfied that Wilson v. Sauve (1927), 81, Colo. 118, 253 Pac. 1065, is determinative of the issues here. It was there held that where one, for a valuable consideration, has assumed the obligation of another to plaintiff, he maybe held liable as garnishee. In such a situation it is not necessary that the garnishee hold tangible real or personal property of the debtor. The assumption of the debts of another when in proper form is a right, credit or chose in action required to be reported in garnishment proceedings under Rule 103 (a), R.C.P. Colo. (see definitions of chose in action in 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary.)

In the instant case there was an assumption of all of Florado's debts by the garnishee except the items not involved here. The consideration for this agreement was the undertaking of Field Family to complete certain houses under construction by Florado and to receive all funds due from Guardian Savings and Loan Association; all deposits from sales and closings, and to assume the debts of Florado. This constituted adequate consideration for the agreement.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DAY and MR. JUSTICE DOYLE concur.


Summaries of

Field Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Mar 13, 1961
360 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1961)
Case details for

Field Co. v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:FIELD FAMILY CONSTRUCTION CO. v. JOHN P. RYAN

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1961

Citations

360 P.2d 110 (Colo. 1961)
360 P.2d 110

Citing Cases

RANSOM DIST. CO. v. LAZY B., LTD

The assumption of debts is action required to be reported in garnishment proceedings. Field Family…

Coin Service v. Grooms

The absence of any creditor-debtor relationship between owner and garnishee distinguishes this matter from…