From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. Raborn

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 20, 1937
173 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

1 Div. 274.

April 20, 1937.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County.

Action by the Fidelity Casualty Company of New York against William Raborn. From an order setting aside a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and granting the defendant's motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Gordon, Edington Leigh, of Mobile, for appellant.

W. C. Taylor and Smith Johnston, all of Mobile, for appellee.


The appeal in this case is from an order of the lower court setting aside the verdict of the jury rendered in favor of plaintiff, and granting a motion of defendant for a new trial.

It appears from the record that this is a companion case to that of Fidelity Casualty Company of New York v. William Raborn, ante, p. 367, 173 So. 399, certiorari denied 234 Ala. 31, 173 So. 402. The two cases were jointly tried, but are here submitted on separate records and involve the same questions on appeal, thus rendering a decision in one case conclusive as to the other case.

In the companion case the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. Case supra. It follows that the judgment in the instant case must be and is affirmed upon authority of and in accordance with the decisions of this court and the Supreme Court, 234 Ala. 31, 173 So. 402, in the case above referred to.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. Raborn

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 20, 1937
173 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. Raborn

Case Details

Full title:FIDELITY CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK v. RABORN

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 20, 1937

Citations

173 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
27 Ala. App. 458

Citing Cases

Sloss-Sheffield Steel Iron Co. v. Willingham

And of the situation presented, counsel for petitioner aptly observes, that where two cases are consolidated…