From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fidelity Acceptance Corp. v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Jan 21, 1980
382 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 13063.

January 21, 1980.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE A. CLAYTON JAMES, J.

Maurice E. Clark, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff, appellant.

Jacqueline Carr, Slidell, for defendants, appellees.

Before COVINGTON, LOTTINGER and COLE, JJ.


Plaintiff appeals a judgment rendered by the trial court upon its own motion dismissing this suit, with prejudice. The issue is whether plaintiff's failure to appear on the scheduled trial date is sufficient cause for such a dismissal considering that defendants' counsel also failed to timely appear and the record is devoid of any meaningful fact other than counsel for plaintiff's explanation that the failure to appear and proceed with the merits was due to a clerical error in his office.

We hold that under the stated circumstances the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's cause of action. C.C.P. arts. 1631, 1672. Cf. Bradford v. J. Ray McDermott Co., Inc., 347 So.2d 1218 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977), writ denied, La., 351 So.2d 155. We vacate the judgment appealed from and remand for dismissal without prejudice or for further proceedings in accordance with law. Costs of the appeal are to be borne by plaintiff.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Fidelity Acceptance Corp. v. Brown

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Jan 21, 1980
382 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Fidelity Acceptance Corp. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:FIDELITY ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. WALLACE R. BROWN AND VERA P. BROWN, AKA…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Jan 21, 1980

Citations

382 So. 2d 1007 (La. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Fauré v. Department of Health & Human Resources, Office of Preventive & Public Health Service

Further, even if appellant's counsel had not been out of town, the notice of reassignment dated May 22, 1984,…

Dooley v. Dooley

Under these circumstances, dismissal of the rule with prejudice was not an abuse of the trial court's…