From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 87-01824.

July 25, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert H. Bonanno, Acting Circuit Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph R. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant Pedro Fernandez challenges the sentences he received after he was found to have violated conditions of probation and community control in three cases in which he was convicted of various drug offenses. We agree with the appellant that the imposition of consecutive sentences in all three cases resulted in a total sentence that exceeded the recommended guidelines range and the permissible one cell bump. Because the trial court provided no written reasons in support of this departure sentence we must remand for resentencing. Since the trial court did not consider the sentence he imposed to be a departure from the guidelines, he may again depart if he supplies valid, written reasons therefor. Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla.2d DCA 1988), approved in State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1989); State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm the appellant's conviction but reverse the appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing with directions consistent herewith.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Fernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Fernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO FERNANDEZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 25, 1990

Citations

564 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Watts v. State

Upon remand, the court may consider imposing a departure sentence. See Fernandez v. State, 564 So.2d 272…

Floyd v. State

Because the record indicates that, due to appellant's habitual offender status, the trial court was unaware…