From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. Cornwall Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2002
296 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-00057

Argued June 3, 2002.

July 8, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant A. Keil appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated November 30, 2001, as, in effect, granted his motion to compel discovery and inspection of the plaintiff's biopsy on condition that he disclose the identity of his expert to the defendant Cornwall Hospital, subject to a confidentiality agreement, before the expert's examination of the plaintiff's biopsy slides.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Jeanne A. Barry and Rory L. Lubin of counsel), for appellant.

Rende, Ryan Downes, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Roland T. Koke of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SONDRA MILLER, CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellant to reveal the identity of his expert pathologist to the defendant Cornwall Hospital before his examination of the plaintiff's pathology slides which relate to the plaintiff's claims of malpractice (see Lucarello v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 184 A.D.2d 623; Cruz v. Elhosseiny, 148 A.D.2d 412). Proper safeguards were put in place by the court.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, S. MILLER and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fernandez v. Cornwall Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 2002
296 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Fernandez v. Cornwall Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JUAN FERNANDEZ, plaintiff-respondent, v. CORNWALL HOSPITAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 714

Citing Cases

HACKETT v. AAA EXPEDITED FRGT. SYS., INC.

To establish that she has suffered a permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member,…

Bolorin v. Ashikari

While standards and goals are not immutable, and exceptions always will exist, compliance should be the norm,…