From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Vaughan Imported Cars Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 29, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

May 29, 1957

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, EUGENE M. McCARTHY, J.

John R. Jones for appellants.

Paul Wolfe for respondent.


Section 233 Real Prop. of the Real Property Law requires the person to whom the deposit is given to hold it in trust and not to mingle it with the personal moneys of the person holding the same. The requirement is not only that the person shall not mingle the money with his own but he shall hold on to it actually or constructively. Placing the money received by the landlord as security in the name of another living person is not a holding within the requirements of this section.

The final order and judgment should be modified by directing judgment in favor of the tenant on the counterclaim for conversion, and as modified final order and judgment affirmed, without costs.

HOFSTADTER, STEUER and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Vaughan Imported Cars Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 29, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Vaughan Imported Cars Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. FERGUSON, JR., Respondent, v. VAUGHAN IMPORTED CARS INC., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 29, 1957

Citations

9 Misc. 2d 188 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
163 N.Y.S.2d 884

Citing Cases

McMaster v. Pearse

First, the title of the security deposit account clearly is of utmost significance. In Ferguson v Vaughan…

McMaster v. Pearse

First, the title of the security deposit account clearly is of utmost significance. In Ferguson v. Vaughan…