From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2021
323 So. 3d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D18-2524

02-18-2021

Willie FERGUSON, Appellant, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

Willie Ferguson, pro se, Appellant. Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Willie Ferguson, pro se, Appellant.

Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Johnson v. State , 297 So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (explaining that "where the oral pronouncement is ambiguous but the record clearly shows the trial court's intent, the proper sentence is what the judge intended it to be"); Henry v. State , 930 So. 2d 716, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("However, even if we were to find the oral pronouncement ambiguous, the trial judge's intent controls.").

Rowe, M.K. Thomas, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Inch

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 18, 2021
323 So. 3d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE FERGUSON, Appellant, v. MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 18, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)