From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenner Investments v. Microsoft

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2010
369 F. App'x 132 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-1496.

March 15, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-00008, Judge Leonard Davis.

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The judgment in this case is affirmed. We uphold the district court's grant of summary judgment of no infringement based on the court's determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that no reasonable jury could find that the accused devices of Microsoft and Nintendo meet the pulse width limitation of the asserted claims of Fenner's U.S. Patent No. 6,297,751 literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. We need not and do not address Microsoft's alternate ground for affirmance, nor do we address the question raised by Fenner whether the district court erred in its construction of the claim term "processor."


Summaries of

Fenner Investments v. Microsoft

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2010
369 F. App'x 132 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Fenner Investments v. Microsoft

Case Details

Full title:FENNER INVESTMENTS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2010

Citations

369 F. App'x 132 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

The Trs. of Purdue Univ. v. Wolfspeed, Inc.

This argument was not raised prior to the court's issuance of its Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and…

Elbit Sys. Land & C4I Ltd. v. Hughes Network Sys., LLC

We agree."); Fenner Inv., Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., 632 F. Supp. 2d 627, 638 (E.D. Tex. 2009) ("Because this…