From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenderson v. United Aut. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 2010
31 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 4D08-2894.

March 31, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 31, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Richard D. Eade, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-7453 05.

Douglas P. Johnson of Douglas P. Johnson Associates, Davie, for appellant.

Juan C. Montes and LaShawn Legair of Lidsky, Vaccaro, Montes Martinez Attorneys at Law, P.A., Hialeah, for appellee.


ON APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION/REHEARING


We grant the appellee's motion for clarification, deny the appellee's motion for rehearing, and substitute the following for our January 27, 2010 opinion.

We reverse the final summary judgment in favor of the appellee on the appellant's bad faith claim only, and remand to the circuit court for the entry of a final judgment dismissing the bad faith claim without prejudice for failing to file a sufficiently specific civil remedy notice complying with section 624.155(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2004). See Villa Maria Nursing Rehab. Ctr., Inc. v. S. Broward Hosp. Dist., 8 So.3d 1167, 1171-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (dismissal should be without prejudice where plaintiff still has time to comply with statutory notice provision that is condition precedent to filing suit).

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON and GERBER, JJ., and BROWN, LUCY CHERNOW, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Fenderson v. United Aut. Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 2010
31 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Fenderson v. United Aut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELLA FENDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 31, 2010

Citations

31 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Lopez v. Geico Cas. Co.

Further, where the defect can no longer be remedied, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. See Fenderson v.…