From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felling v. Giles

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 24, 1998
962 S.W.2d 944 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72060

Order Filed: February 24, 1998

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. ROBERT H. DIERKER, JR.

Gary Siegel, Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum, Spewak, 7700 Bonhomme, Ste. 400, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.

Hugh R. Law, Lowenhaupt, Chasnoff, LLC., 10 S. Broadway, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63102, for respondent.

Before Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski, J., and Gaertner, J.



ORDER


Appellants, David Felling and Dennis Fitzwilliam, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered in favor of respondent, Larry Giles, on plaintiffs' petition insofar as the court held no partnership existed between the parties and further found appellants were not entitled to an accounting. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Felling v. Giles

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Feb 24, 1998
962 S.W.2d 944 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Felling v. Giles

Case Details

Full title:DAVID FELLING AND DENNIS FITZWILLIAM, APPELLANTS, v. LARRY GILES…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Feb 24, 1998

Citations

962 S.W.2d 944 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)