Opinion
April 13, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
A bifurcated trial is normally appropriate in a negligence case. A trial on the issues of both liability and damages should be held only where the nature of the injuries has an important bearing on the issue of liability ( see, Rothbard v. Woolworth Co., 233 A.D.2d 434; Stanford v. Resler, 206 A.D.2d 468). Here, the plaintiffs failed to show any need to introduce evidence of the infant plaintiff's injuries in order to establish liability. Therefore, it was not an improvident exercise of the court's discretion to grant the defendants' respective motions for a bifurcated trial on the issues of liability and damages.
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.